Government planners are now inundating us with tears about the large proportion (variously estimated at 10-14%) of American resources that are used for medical care. Actually much of this expenditure is not for medical care at all. Medical care in America is burdened by enormous waste in the form of financial transfers to hundreds of thousands of regulators, bureaucrats, lawyers, and other non-providers of medicine who have been attached to the medical care system by government edicts. It is also burdened by high direct taxes paid by all individuals, institutions, and businesses within the system - productive or not. Techniques of medical care have also been distorted by government meddling through tens of billions of dollars in medical research expenditures directed by bureaucrats with little interest in the ultimate value and efficiency of the products of these programs. Regardless of these punitive value-subtracted payments, however, Americans have been buying as much medical care as they can afford. Free enterprise, even after taxes, has made American medical care by far the best in the world. Older Americans, who require the greatest amount of care, have had universal access to this high quality medicine through the welfare subsidies of Medicare and related programs. Medical welfare could be handled largely through direct taxpayer subsidies in much the same way that food stamps now feed 25 million Americans. Now Mr. and Ms. Clinton are telling us that government medical welfare payments have left too many people out - that many citizens are still without care. Moreover, they say that the government wants to buy care for these additional people, but it doesn't want to pay the market price - a price that has been doubled (at least) by government programs which they are unwilling to dismantle. Their solution is to destroy the system that they wish to feed upon. Instead of a program like food stamps, they propose the equivalent of price controls on grocery stores and farmers and a card for every American giving free access to everything on the grocery shelves. We shall pay for the card if we are able. If not, they will give one to us. This debate should be about the rights to life, liberty, and property. The tax payers have a right to their property. The physicians have a right to their liberty. Each American has a right to the best life and medical care that he or she can obtain. These rights would be best served by getting the government out of medical care entirely - not by getting the government further into it. The debate should be about freedom, but in America today that is not going to happen. The Clintons are busy promoting the politics of envy and greed - the promise of something for nothing at someone else's expense, and the people are buying these dishonorable lies. The people will pay for this gullibility, of course, as they always pay with higher taxes, lower living standards, less freedom, and more powerful and numerous bureaucrats and politicians. This time, however, they will pay more. They will pay with their lives. The July and October issues of
The Clintons will put us all on a national medical credit card. We are to pay a fraction of the bill each month, but our individual payment is the same whether we use it or not. Moreover, to control overall cost, they will put price controls on the medical care providers at price levels below the free market. This will simultaneously cause increased demand and decreased supply of medical care.
The Clintons understand this. That is why their plan comes with all the bureaucratic baggage of a rationing system. That is why they have been organizing "forums'' in counties throughout the United States in which citizen participants are shown videos of actors playing patients with various illnesses and requiring various treatments. After viewing these videos, the participants are required to decide which patients will be treated and which will not by ranking them in order of priority. Those who rank the patients equally and refuse to suggest who should live and who should die are ostracized as uncooperative.
Forum participants are chosen from lists of people who have experienced unusually extensive medical problems. They are told the sessions are being held to help the government set rules for medical treatment.
Price controls lead to shortages. Shortages lead to rationing. Rationing medical care will give the Clintons and their friends like Joy-celyn Elders the power of life and death over all Americans -especially older Americans. Older Americans will obviously receive the lower priorities. Older Americans also happen to be a voting block that generally opposes Clinton and a group to whom the government owes a huge debt in Social Security that it cannot pay.
Petr Beckmann died August 3, 1993. Under the Clinton medical plan, he would have died many years earlier. In a true free market without government interference, he might still be alive.
Why hasn't this been tried before?
It has not been tried before, because America has never before had a President so entirely devoid of moral character that he was willing to tell this particular lie to the American people.
This is being called by the name of "health care reform.'' The details are being debated. It will probably be enacted in a less onerous form than proposed. Once in place, the system will grow in direct proportion to its failures, and it will destroy the free enterprise that has made our medical system the best in the world. Then also will come the higher taxes and the rationing and the inevitable scapegoating for the system's failures. In time, the life expectancies of Americans will measurably decrease.
Government bureaucrats already have taken too much of our liberty and our property. Why must we give them our lives too?
America does not need a program of mandatory euthanasia.
|
|
Vol. 21, No. 3
Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive Volume: Issues Issue/No.: Vol. 21, No. 3 Date: November 01, 1993 05:47 PM Title: The Euthanasia Act of 1994
Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
|