In the absence of cooperative thermometers, the global warmers have been looking for other indicators - such as increased rainfall caused by increased evaporation of water caused by higher temperatures.
This sort of finding is already questionable because there are many ways to look at rainfall data. Did they try one-inch days, three-inch days, five-inch weeks, or other subdivisions? It is likely that numerous subdivisions were tried and the "best'' one published. Was the statistical significance of the result corrected for these other tries?
Leaving this aside, however, notice that most of this increase occurred before 1940 - again before most of the carbon dioxide release.
Figure 4, however, provides further embarrassment for Gore's rain dance. It is one of five similar figures (the others show essentially the same result for different geographical regions) in "Evaporation Losing Its Strength'' by Peterson, T. C., Golubev, V. S. and Groisman, P. Y.,
Nature 377, pp 687-688 (1995). Reported are data from 936 evaporation-pan stations where rate of water evaporation is measured. Evaporation rate is, of course, dependent upon many factors besides temperature, but the "torrential rains'' are supposed to have resulted from increased evaporation. As the figure shows, evaporation rates have actually fluctuated downward during the period in question.Maybe these people should go back into the global cooling business (in which many of them were found during previous decades). The satellite data shows a slight cooling and the rest of the data, probably just from ordinary fluctuations, looks better for them there, too.

|
|
Vol. 23, No. 6
Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive Volume: Issues Issue/No.: Vol. 23, No. 6 Date: February 01, 1996 01:59 PM Title: Peer Review
Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
|