Access to Energy

INTRINSIC MUTATIONS

"The Health Effects of Low-Level Radiation'' by Myron Polly-cove, Health & Environment Digest 10, No. 7, pp 52 -54, November (1996), available from the Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, MN 55331, is an excellent summary of some of the best experiments showing that ionizing radiation, in low to moderate doses, increases human health. These have been described in previous issues of Access to Energy except for "Mortality from Breast Cancer after Irradiation during Fluoroscopic Examination in Patients Being Treated for Tuberculosis, A. B. Miller, et al, New England Journal of Medicine 321, pp 1285-1289 (1989). In this study, breast cancer deaths decreased by 40% in women who received about 0.15 Gy of radiation. At about 0.35 Gy, the death rate was the same as for women who were not irradiated. Above 0.35 Gy, the death rate gradually increased to a level of about twice the nonirradiated group at 1.75 Gy.

Pollycove summarizes the molecular biological discoveries (appropriate literature references are in his article) that permit us to understand why radiation improves health as follows:

1. "The very high background of intrinsic potential mutations (240,000/cell/day) produced by reactive oxygen metabolytes (ROM: free radicals and H 2O2) and thermal instability compared to 20 potential mutations produced predominately by the free radicals generated by 1 r of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. By comparison, the average background radiation in the U.S., including radon, is approximately one-third r. In addition, by fundamental limitations on the accuracy of DNA replication and repair, every single gene is likely to undergo 400,000 unrepaired mutations per day in each person.''

2. "The presence of an active DNA damage control biosystem that, until declining with age, effectively prevents, repairs and removes intrinsic and environmental mutations.''

3. "The activity of the DNA damage control biosystem is decreased by high dose (e.g., at or above 100r), high-dose-rate (at or above 20r per m) radiation, but adaptively responds with increased activity to low dose (e.g., at or below 20r), low-dose-rate (e.g., at or below 1r per m) radiation as well as low-dose toxic chemical agents.''

In other words, the ordinary chemical deterioration and rebuilding of cellular genetic material in living things is so great in magnitude that deterioration from low doses of radiation does not contribute significantly to the destruction and replacement that is an essential function of life. Low doses of radiation and toxic chemicals do, however, stimulate the ordinary repair mechanisms to work harder. The net result is that these repair systems do a better job of correcting ordinary natural biochemical deterioration, so health is better rather than poorer as a result of low exposures to radiation and toxic chemicals.

(For a chemical example, Doctors for Disaster Preparedness Newsletter, July 1994, available from 1601 N. Tucson Blvd., Suite 9, Tucson, AZ 85716, and Second Opinion, December 1996, available from 7100 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Suite 100, Atlanta, GA 30328, both report a study by William Hazeltine, Lancet II (7161): 4-6, July 1969, showing increased health in Beagle dogs that were given 10 parts per million DDT in their diets.) These explanations will be refined by future research and may even prove to be incorrect. This cannot, however, change the experimental findings that disease incidence is lower and health is better in people exposed to moderately increased amounts of ionizing radiation.

The natural intrinsic mutation rate is so high that we need extensive biochemical machinery to cope with it. That machinery works better in the presence of low-level damage from extrinsic factors, so such damage improves our health.

This is not just a new scientific curiosity. It is going to cause a virtual revolution in environmental politics, since it means that the vast enviro apparatus constructed to prevent low levels of exposure to radiation and other such factors has actually been diminishing rather than improving health. It is so politically incorrect that, so far, the news media have completely ignored it, but the truth cannot be ignored forever.

Those who want to reverse public fear of nuclear power should be actively advertising this effect rather than trying to hide under the en-viro lie of global warming. Global warming will eventually die because it is a false construct, but no one can cause radiation hormesis (the beneficial effects of low level radiation) to die because it is an experimentally demonstrated, naturally occurring biochemical truth.



 • Science and Honor
 • GLOBAL TEMPERATURE VARIATION
 • THOMAS JEFFERSON
 • INTRINSIC MUTATIONS
 • STARK RAVING MAD
 • GOOD READING
Vol. 24, No. 5

Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
Volume: Issues
Issue/No.: Vol. 24, No. 5

Date: January 01, 1997 03:47 PM
Title: Science and Honor

Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
All rights reserved.