Access to Energy

Economic Slavery

Energy accessibility should be solely a technological problem. As engineering knowledge and the science that underlies it continue to advance, the real cost of usable energy decreases and energy availability for each of us should, therefore, concomitantly increase. Since energy is virtually the currency of technological progress, everything from human living standards to human longevity increases as people obtain more energy - and at a rate that, given the large number of innovative scientists and engineers and the technology at their disposal, could be astonishing indeed.

Instead, however, progress in energy development is today severely stalled. In the United States, propaganda campaigns by all sorts of ignorant, fearful, and uninformed groups have led to a tragic diminution of progress on technologies that affect our access to energy.

The problem, however, is not misinformed people. Informed innovators could make progress even if their fellow citizens could not - if the freedom of those capable people were not being suppressed.

This suppression of freedom is essentially a question of property. It is a self-evident truth that economic freedom is an indispensable part of human freedom. A person who cannot hold property and use it as he wishes becomes a slave. Every free human being has the right to hold and use his private property in any way he wishes as long as he does not infringe on this same right of other people.

This right to private property does not depend upon the Constitution or the Bill of Rights or even common law. It is an inherent right that has been recognized as an indispensable part of freedom for thousands of years. Men and women cannot be free if they lack the right to private property and complete freedom in its responsible use. Those who do not have such property rights are slaves - regardless of whether or not their property has been seized by an oppressive government against their will or voluntarily turned over to some other entity, as is the situation, for example, with some religious sects. There are, of course, degrees of slavery. People can also lose or relinquish a part of their economic freedom.

Obviously, certain property rights, such as the allotment of airspace to airplanes, require communal adjudication. Also, a judicial system and usually a military defense are required to assure protection of property rights. These are legitimate functions of government.

Many aspects of our future access to energy look bleak today. The real reason for this is that our energy producers are being denied their fundamental rights to private property.

Why do we care that Al Gore is listed as author of a book filled with misrepresentations about energy production? Gore cannot fill our energy needs. His views should be irrelevant. We care about Gore's views only because misguided laws backed by the police powers of the state are being used to interfere with the property rights of those who can produce energy. This has hindered the advancement of nuclear energy in the United States and is increasingly interfering with the production of energy from coal, oil, and natural gas.

Why have we allowed the economic freedom of our most productive scientists, engineers, and businessmen to be so severely abridged that the flow of energy to our civilization has become imperiled?

While most of us might answer this question by means of a well-oiled tirade against oppressive politicians, bureaucrats, and other low types - and be correct in doing so - there is another consideration.

Every free human being (or assembly of human beings, such as a corporation, that shares their pooled rights) has the right to use his property as he wishes as long as he does not infringe on the same rights of other human beings.

For example, the sympathies of a twelve-man jury in a civil trial would ordinarily lie with the victim of a burglary and against the burglar - unless the victim also turned out to be a burglar. Regardless of the details of law, most people would agree that a burglar, as a result of his thievery, gives up his claim to sympathy when he, too, is burglarized. If I am mugged on a city street by a thug who steals my wallet, I do not gain the right to replace my loss by mugging someone else. If I become a mugger, I forfeit my right to property protection - and, of course, even my right to physical freedom if I am caught.

Most farmers are bitterly opposed to government agencies that are taking their property through regulations, taxes, fees, and confiscations. Yet, many of these same farmers are paid government subsidies with money taken in taxes by force or threat of force from other citizens who have earned that money by honest work. Since these farmers are accepting a share of the loot obtained by denying other citizens their property rights, they have lost the moral right to complain of their own losses to government thievery.

Recently, a local farmer complained to me about the new government regulations, fees, and potential fines that are destroying his property right to maintain a gravel dam necessary to irrigate his farm. When I suggested that he just ignore the bureaucrats and repair his dam in the same way that it has been maintained for over 100 years by owners of his farm, he replied, "I wouldn't want to make them mad. They are considering my request for a government subsidy to put in a sprinkler system. Then I can sell the farm for a higher price.'' It is an astonishing and very sad fact that many American industries support and encourage the taking of property from other Ameri-cans through governmental means in order to enhance their own prospects. Yet, they whine about their own suffering under the same sort of oppression. Much of our energy industry engages in these activities. In fact, a large part of the American utility industry has traded away most of its freedom in return for government-assured monopoly markets and guaranteed profits from utility commissions.

If all Americans and American corporations were to honestly audit all of their own sources of income and other market advantages and terminate all activities that involve the improper taking of the property of others, the benefits to the free market and to technological progress would be spectacular indeed. Imagine our government with no customers except for those involved in national defense, the maintenance of an honest judiciary, and minimal national housekeeping!

Free enterprise, science, and technology cannot thrive in an atmosphere of economic slavery. Each human being has a self-evident right to freedom, except for those people who make their way by destroying the freedoms of others. Those people deserve to be slaves.



 • Economic Slavery
 • SCIENCE VS. SCIENTISTS
 • TAX FINANCED RACISM
 • SAN DIEGO MEETING
 • STARK RAVING MAD
 • GOOD READING
Vol. 24, No. 8

Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
Volume: Issues
Issue/No.: Vol. 24, No. 8

Date: April 01, 1997 01:00 PM
Title: Economic Slavery

Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
All rights reserved.