If the ease with which one can make profits is taken as the criterion, there is no doubt that the most profitable type of energy right now is solar: Oodles of solar consultants produce oodles of studies proving that the problem requires oodles of further study, for which they get oodles of money printed by the government as claim checks for the real wealth produced by the producers.
All of which is not enough government for Mr Denis Hayes, the ideologist directing the DoE's Solar Energy Research Institute, not even when it spends $500,000 a year to push the energy that needs pushing. In an interview with Stevens Energy Forum (vol.3, no.1), he complains that "every time a business buys petroleum, coal or natural gas to provide energy that could be supplied by the sun, that firm can deduct the cost of the fuel as a business expense. Since solar energy involves no fuel, it does not have this advantage."
This is a most interesting "institutional obstacle," as Hayes terms it; his economics is as brilliant as his solar physics. Fortunately, help is on the way. Mr Gordon S. Jones of Arlington, Va., in a letter to the editor of SEF, invites Mr. Hayes to refer companies willing to pay for solar energy to him:
"I have solar energy available at a wide range of prices..."he writes. "I can guarantee that the price will be high enough that the company can obtain a substantial tax deduction for the cost of purchased fuel...
"With this inequity eliminated, I hope we will hear no more about the tax biases against solar energy. As does Mr. Hayes, I think solar should compete on an equal footing..."
GRAPHIC: A09_8004.TIF
|
Vol. 8, No. 1
Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive Volume: Volume 8 Issue/No.: Vol. 8, No. 1 Date: September 01, 1980 04:03 PM Title: The next victim is decency
Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
|