Access to Energy

INHERENT SAFETY

SLOWPOKE (to which we promised to come back in last month's "Canadian" issue) stands for Safe Low Power Critical Experiment, though it is no longer an experiment, but a proven success. SLOWPOKE is a tiny nuclear reactor producing 20 kW of heat and no electricity; its job is to generate neutron radiation with high flux and low cost for a variety of purposes, such as production of shortlived radioisotopes in medical therapy and diagnostics.

Experiments conducted at the Los Alamos Scientific Labs in 1967 made a Canadian scientist, Dr John Hilborn, realize that a large neutron flux could be obtained from a tiny (2 lbs) mass of enriched uranium immersed in water as coolant and moderator, when it is surrounded by beryllium reflectors.

Let's go over that again. When a U 235 nucleus absorbs a neutron, it splits and spits out several neutrons of its own. If at least one of these, on the average, splits another U 235 nucleus, you have a split'n spit chain reaction; the reactor goes critical.

There are two reasons why this does not easily happen: One is that the spat out neutrons are too fast; they must be slowed before they are capable of splitting further atoms, and this is done by the moderator - - water, or more precisely, the hydrogen nuclei in the water. When a neutron hits one, it bounces off more slowly than it came in, like a tennis ball hitting a foam mattress. The other reason is that the neutrons, fast or slow, simply get lost by leaving the volume of uranium; but in a SLOWPOKE reactor they are bounced back by the beryllium mirrors like tennis balls by a concrete wall.

The core is, in fact, a little cylinder of fuel rods no bigger than 9 ins in diameter and 9 ins in height. It sits in a container (shown on the next page), which in turn is suspended in a pool of water in the user's basement, about 20 ft deep, and 8 ft in diameter. Samples to be irradiated are lowered into the vicinity of the core through one of two tubes; and the water in the outer pool gets warm by contact with the reactor container.

GRAPHIC: A05_8101.TIF

But before we come to the heat, let us take a look at the safety. SLOWPOKE is inherently safe; it does not need any engineered safety measures or a defense in depth, because there is nothing to defend against. It is even safe against the biggest of all threats, human error: It can be operated by virtually unskilled operators who turn it on or off by the flick of a switch. And they need not turn it off¾it runs unattended for long periods. If for some reason the reactivity increases, the temperature of the water in the container will rise, expanding the water and thus decreasing the density of the hydrogen atoms which are necessary to maintain the chain reaction, so that the reactivity is decreased again. This type of stability by self-adjustment of the moderator is common to all properly designed reactors, large or small. In fact, a point that is often forgotten is that if a nuclear reactor were to lose its cooling water completely, the first thing to happen would be the instant termination of the chain reaction, for the agent maintaining it would disappear with the water. The danger of a meltdown comes not from the chain reaction, but from the fission products which continue to generate a small amount of heat on their own.

Such fission products are present in SLOWPOKE's fuel rods, too; but even without coolant, they cannot raise the temperature anywhere near the melting point of the metal, because the power density (heat produced per cubic inch per second) is insufficient.

SLOWPOKE thus works without safety back-up devices; "it is safer without operators than with them," Dr Hilborn told this writer in an interview.

Insufficient power density to melt the fuel assembly is again a trick that is used in at least one large reactor¾the High Temperature Gas Reactor [AtE Jan 81]. Alas, a public brainwashed daily by superstitious concoctions is not impressed by physical laws or other facts, especially when they are censored. But here, too, SLOWPOKE has a unique advantage: It has been running since 1971 at several universities and other institutions, licensed, and frequently unattended and unguarded. Of course there have been troubles and failures. So what? A telephone call will get qualified personnel to look into the reactor (the operators have no access to its interior), and there is plenty of time to set things right.

The bare fact of the SLOWPOKEs running for a decade is no mean advantage. The HTGR at Fort St. Vrain [AtE Jan 81], for example, is also inherently protected from meltdowns and therefore does not need a massive containment building. But only last month was it allowed to go to 70% of its rated power. Yet every time a pump fails or it "leaks" a microcurie, the local environmental reporters still hope, with dilated pupils and drooling mouths, for a meltdown. How tragic to be dull-witted; with a little more ability, they might have become editors of the classified ad pages.

[More: R.E. Kay and J.W. Hilborn, "SLOWPOKE: A demonstration of simplified reactor control and unattended operation" (p.453) and "The selflimiting power excursion behavior of a SLOWPOKE reactor," (p.481-2), ANS Transactions vol. 17 (1973); "Can SLOWPOKE do what CANDU can't?" Canadian Business, Aug. 1980; "Downsizing nuclear plants," Business Week, 10 Nov 80, p. 144; interested readers should also follow the excellent Canadian journal Ascent.]



 • The soft path of the brass knuckles
 • INHERENT SAFETY
 • FROM MICRO TO MINI
 • WHY LOVINS LOVES THEM
 • CLEAN COAL, DIRTY AIR
 • 1980 DATA JUST IN
 • GOOD READING
Vol. 8, No. 9

Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
Volume: Issues
Issue/No.: Vol. 8, No. 9

Date: November 23, 2004 10:35 AM
Title: The soft path of the brass knuckles

Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
All rights reserved.