Access to Energy

THE SPACE SHUTTLE

There were many reasons why the flight of the space shuttle was exhilarating, and one of them was the realization that a decade of antiscientific propaganda ("Truth is relative"¾"Technology is war") had only dimmed the minds of the programable, not America's enthusiasm for progress, technology, and leadership. Tens of millions in the US, and hundreds of millions abroad, tuned in, and almost a quarter of a million drove into the California desert to welcome the shuttle home.

"Eat your hearts out, Russians," said some of the T-shirts in the crowd, and eat their hearts out is exactly what the Russians did. "A plot of US elite classes to place weaponry in space," fumed TASS.

Wrong again: The US elite classes will do their damnedest to ruin anything connected with defense; after all, it uses up money that is sorely needed for feasibility studies of solar power applied to Lesbian consciousness among the underprivileged. But as for placing weaponry in space, yes! The Soviets were rightly irked.

The shuttle will build satellites for electronic and visual surveillance, for tracking Soviet killer satellites, for early warning systems and for worldwide communications. Much of its payload will be military, and the air force is hoping to launch its own shuttles within a few years. Space is the new strategic high ground¾a reincarnation of the medieval high castle rock.

Strength and deterrence is what has kept the peace for 36 years; weakness is what is inviting war.(*)

Yes, the shuttle was built by the government with taxpayers' money. And so it should: National defense against aggressors is, above all, what government is for. When pampered kids who have never known either war or oppression ask why $9 billion have been spent on the space shuttle, tell them: to defend liberty. There is no nobler cause, and few ways are as cheap.

* See N. Podhoretz' superb article "The Future Danger" in Commentary, April 1981.

... AND BEYOND

But space is not merely a potential battleground. There are unsuspected possibilities for industry, industrial processes¾and energy.

No, not star-trek fairy stories, nor dreams about permanent space colonies, which are still far away. But there are lucrative commercial applications for industry¾new methods of metal casting, vaporization, distillation, and other manufacturing processes. A single example: It takes much time, energy, effort, patience, and money to get a good vacuum on earth¾and a millionth or ten-millionth of atmospheric pressure is considered "good." But that still leaves about a billion molecules per cubic inch, and you can do a thousand times better (in pressure) by going some 500 km above the earth's surface, and a billion times better out there in real space where one bumps only into an occasional particle (relatively speaking). Take a bottle there, fill it full of nothing, seal it and bring it back¾with a vacuum like nothing on earth.

And there is much more¾read about it in G. Harry Stine's The Third Industrial Revolution (Ace Books, paperback was $2.75 in 1979; try $3.50 from Book Mailing Service, Box 690, Rockville, NY 11571).



 • Defending the environment against the Sierra Club
 • READING LIST
 • THE SPACE SHUTTLE
 • ENERGY IN SPACE
 • THE SOLAR POWER SATELLITE
 • MORE ECONOMICS...
 • ... AND MORE ECONOMISTS
 • ENERGY SCRIBBLINGS
 • HEALTH HAZARDS
 • GOOD READING
 • RENEWAL
Vol. 8, No. 10

Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
Volume: Issues
Issue/No.: Vol. 8, No. 10

Date: November 23, 2004 11:51 AM (For actual publication date see newsletter.)
Title: Defending the environment against the Sierra Club

Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
All rights reserved.