As this is being written, the death toll from the toxic gas release in the Indian pesticide plant is passing the 2,000 mark. Almost as appalling is the report that "half the top personal injury lawyers in America are on planes to New Delhi"
¾to file suits aiding all victims who can pay a fat enough retainer.But they are not the lowest of the vultures who will seek to make hay from this tragedy. As sure as day follows night, the NRDC, the Pesticide Network, and the other sham-environmentalists will wail to high heaven that this is the result of uncontrolled science and technology, and of corporate greed for profits.
Baloney.
First, no science and no technology is perfect; but whenever they go wrong, the trouble is not too much technology, but too little. Whatever the cause of the disaster, it could have been prevented by more and better safety systems. Disasters are caused by insufficient or bad technology, not by technology as such.
Second, the purpose of the plant was to kin insects, not people. It did kill 2,000 people inadvertently; but what it did intentionally was to save millions from death by disease and starvation. Stand up, Ralph Nader, Tony Roisman and the other corporation baiters, and tell us that it would have been better for those millions to die unseen!
There is one man who should have no difficulty in saying so: Paul Ehrlich. Though presently engaged in scaring America into defenselessness, he spent years opposing pesticides, opposing the Green Revolution, promoting de-industrialization, and advocating radical population control
¾by coercive sterilization if necessary. It was, in fact, in India, "one stinking hot night in Delhi," that this Herrenvolk type learned to hate people. "People thrusting their hands through the taxi window, begging," he writes in the Population Bomb. "People clinging to buses¾people herding animals¾people, people, people." Well now, what happened at Bhopal¾isn't that a bit of what he always wanted?As for the reckless drive for profits having caused the catastrophe, just who is it who has profited? Only the anti-capitalist and sham-environmentalist ghouls who will grind their axes on the gravestones of the dead. As for Union Carbide, its stock lost $300 million in market value within three days of the disaster, and there was talk of whether they could handle the liability without going bankrupt. Should they prove to have been at fault, it means that they were not looking after their profits conscientiously enough.
The idea that private enterprise recklessly despoils the environment for its own profits is one that is deeply cherished by all brainless parrots, but it runs counter to reason: the one who will never kill the goose that lays the golden eggs is its owner. There was nothing wrong, for example, with Love Canal as long as Hooker Co. owned it; it was local government that built a school there over Hooker's protests and warnings.
Equally absurd is the idea that only government regulation forced uranium companies to cover the tailings after mining and milling the ore. This is a myth particularly dear to those who cover up the radioactivity of the very same source as in uranium tailings
¾radon gas and its daughters¾when it is incomparably more dangerous, but is linked to energy conservation.History tells us otherwise. The danger of radon was not recognized until the mid-fifties, when an increased incidence of lung cancer among uranium miners was noted in several countries (it had never been mined on a large scale before). In the mid-sixties, the adverse impact of tailings on the environment was noted and it was the mining companies, not the Naderite charlatans, who pressed for a standard
¾for their own healthy selfish reasons, as they did not wish to waste their profits on liability litigation. In those days the US Public Health Service had no jurisdiction (there was no EPA), so they turned to the states. Colorado was the first to draw up such a standard which was adopted in 1965. The Colorado Dept. of Health was prompted to do so by a particularly insistent company pressing the point.The company?
Union Carbide.
|
Vol. 12, No. 6
Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive Volume: Issues Issue/No.: Vol. 12, No. 6 Date: November 29, 2004 01:55 PM (For actual publication date see newsletter.) Title: Disaster in India
Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
|