Early this year PS of NH filed for bankruptcy after a court refused to let it include the costs of the Seabrook nuclear plant in its rate base. Together with the plight of LILCO's Shoreham plant, this has been widely taken as another demonstration that nuclear power is dead or dying.
Nonsense. Power sources are ultimately selected neither by politicians nor by scientists, but by the inexorable logic of facts. That logic can be delayed by a few years, but not elimi-nated for good. Nuclear power must ultimately triumph not, alas, because it is healthier and safer (which it is), but because its competitors will not be able to satisfy the demand.
Coal will gradually decline due to its outdated infrastructure labor intensity and dependence on rail transportation. (In 1987, US coal-fired capacity under construction dropped by 23% from 1986, and the planned, but not yet begun, coal ad-ditions dropped by 30%.) Oil-fired electricity, even at present "low" oil prices, is expected to increase the trade deficit by $18 billion each year
¾not to mention the national security aspect of rising oil imports. The good remaining hydro sites, now blocked by the sham-environmentalists, are too few to make a difference.Omitting Lovins' expensive toys of piddle power, that leaves natural gas, which very likely will become the only major economic competitor of nuclear power for the first decades of the next century.
Seabrook, therefore, will eventually go on line. But there are other lessons in PSNH's bankruptcy.
The final blow was delivered by the judicial branch of the US shadow government. With notable exceptions, it caters to the real government
¾the mass media, which program the electorate. More substantially, the dirty work was done by the shadow legislative branch in Congress and by the local shadow executive branch¾Dukakis, Cuomo & Co, whose servility to the real US government has even fewer exceptions. Closer to the roots, widespread antitechnology sentiment and resent-ment of big corporations was exploited by media brainwash and by the activism of Naderite storm troopers, who¾at Sea-brook in particular¾asserted their "constitutional rights" to criminal trespass and other lawlessness. The real costs of the plant were small compared to those inflicted by artificial delays, approaching $1 million/day. Remember all of these factors next time you hear that nuclear power has failed in the market¾a hypocritical allegation made by the Left in sand-bagging nuclear power as a surrogate target for capitalism.But the leftist redistributor who wants to coerce society into let-me-sit-on-the-board democracy is not capitalism's only enemy. The other is the capitalist who has found a shortcut to competition: protection by the shadow government. Capital-ism is a system that favors the consumer; it disciplines the capi-talist and may drive him to oppose it. I refer to that as "Foy's principle," [AtE Oct 82], but Milton Friedman said much the same thing, as did Adam Smith himself.
But anti-Japanese protectionism is only the most obvious form of the capitalist's anti-capitalism. A more widespread and insidious form is servile, self-destructive conformity to media-managed attitudes (such as "social responsibility"). It has recently been revealed how the flacks of Ford Motor Co. quite needlessly played guilty about the Pinto, settled out of court with its accusers, and lavished money on the likes of PBS in hopes of making a good impression on the public. That reminded me of nothing so much as of the nuclear flacks after TMI: Instead of celebrating the historic event of 940 MW getting out of control without hurting a living soul (try that with any other energy), they wailed "We have been bad boys, but we will sin no more."
PSNH was finally done in by the media-backed storm-troopers and politicians; but the corporate princes of servility, conformity and benightedness are not without blame.
And there is something more general here. Nuclear power is losing because its custodians let their adversaries' conquer the moral high ground [AtE Oct 87]. But the Western World is losing in the same way. Communism is advancing by its ap-peal, however fraudulent, to morality. Capitalism, the system of voluntary choice and absence of coercion, is losing because its apologetic custodians are too ignorant to realize that it is the most moral system in history.
|
|
Vol. 15, No. 7
Newsletter: Access to Energy Newsletter Archive Volume: Issues Issue/No.: Vol. 15, No. 7 Date: December 01, 2004 01:08 PM Title: Seabrook and the West
Copyright © 2004 - Access to Energy Newsletter Archive
|